Skip to content
Wager Studio

Tetris Couldn't Win at The Game Awards — Another Award Type Could Fix That

Whenever a significant prize-giving event nears, you'll find a demand to include fresh award types to acknowledge overlooked contributions and satisfy the passions of fans with niche passions.

My colleague has already made advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are tabletop games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front just as with other single-minded supporters, I possess a compelling case for why my demand remains most pressing and significant. This is the request: We need a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Classifying creative works isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably start arguments concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason film award organizations steer clear of genre categories. But it is a necessary evil in the world of video games, which are so diverse they barely qualify a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events offer these genre categories for Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these six categories successfully include a lot of ground, allowing placement accommodating various experiences.

Not so for brain-teasing titles. There’s simply nowhere to accommodate them. Consider three of outstanding current releases, showing diverse approaches: building puzzles in a particular game, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. Which classification works among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens excellent brain-teasers published annually lacking appropriate categories in entertainment awards, unless they happen to qualify award groups including Mobile Game, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

  • A renowned logic title got overlooked completely in 2014
  • Another imaginative release missed out that year
  • Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment in 2021
  • Limited numbers of puzzle games managed to sneak into independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often compact experiences, but the art of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games rank among most engaged experiences in the world continuing this trend for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with famous sandbox experiences competing to become most purchased experience; it also contends as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks for gaming as medium, while interacting with almost every other genre.

The Solution and Justification

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. One could readily select a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, since numerous excellent so many good games out.

Restating the point, these include experiences that otherwise have no home in important events. Puzzle game makers operate at the hard edge of video game design, developing some of the purest expressions of the video game form. Just like movie stunt professionals, they deserve recognition. Don't make them wait generations.

DA
By

Douglas Ayala

Elara Vance is a seasoned sports analyst and betting strategist with over a decade of experience in the wagering industry.

Wager Studio

Type to search articles.